🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."